INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (IJSS)

Regulation and Precariatisation of Working Life

E-ISSN: 7885-4322

P-ISSN: 9347-2192

DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/1033

The regulation of labour market attachment and working conditions now appears to be a thoroughly cultural and political issue, which is just as much a subjection to compulsory flexibility in association with the deregulation of collectively attained rights. Precarious working life is an age-old form of exploitation, expanding in our days to the academic fields of communication work and knowledge work. Sum and Jessop offer an approach to the theoretical understanding of this current epoch. However, their leaning on Foucault together with information science and systems science set a decisive limit to any phenomenological perspective of cultural and political experience – and thus hamper their project of outlining a cultural political economy. Still, Sum and Jessop’s important contribution to the notion of a cultural political economy must be recognized, not least when it comes to grasping the precariatisation of academic knowledge work and communication work. 

Keyword(s) Regulation, Precariatisation, Working Life.
About the Journal Volume. 8, Issue. 4 | December 2025
Quality GOOD

Kurt Dauer Keller & Hanne Dauer Keller

Beck, U. & E. Beck-Gernsheim (2001). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. Sage Publications. 


Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd Ed. Wiley-Blackwell. 


Dreyfus, H. & P. Rabinow (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press. 


Han, B. (2002). Foucault's Critical Project. Stanford University Press. 


Keller, K.D (2013). ‘Political Attitude in the Age of Globalization’ in O.G. Augustin & C. Ydesen (Eds.): Post-Crisis Perspectives: The Common and its Powers. Peter Lang Edition. 

article