E-ISSN: 2133 - 3762
P-ISSN: 3224 - 7786
DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/1226
Knowledge about intimate partner violence depends on what perpetrators and survivors make public. There is rarely a window into the privacy of the family from the viewpoint of child witnesses. Through purposive sampling and the grounded theory method, this qualitative study aimed to discover the intersectionality of power, gender, and intimate partner violence (IPV) from adult daughters' perspectives (N = 68) who, during childhood, witnessed the abuse of their mothers by their step/fathers. Thematic data analysis revealed three psychosocial processes supporting male power and control toward intimate female partners: 1) coercive duality of public and private personas, 2) coercive normative order in the household, and 3) coercive control rooted in childhood household disorder. This study's findings underscore the importance of addressing partner violence as a community-wide affliction rather than an intimate issue.
KIM M. ANDERSON PhD & ESTEBAN L. SANTIS PhD
Anderson, K.M. (2012). Fostering resilience in daughters of battered women. In D. Becvar (Ed). Handbook of Family Resilience (pp.495-514). New York: Springer Publishing.
Anderson, K. M., & Danis, F. S. (2007). Collegiate sororities and dating violence: An exploratory study of informal and formal helping strategies. Violence Against Women, 13(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1077801206294808
Barnett, R. C., & Hyde, J. S. (2001). Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory. American Psychologist, 56(10), 781-796.
Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547-566.
Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States—2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/datasources.html