E-ISSN: 3433-5443
P-ISSN: 2445-2943
DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/1267
The manufacturing of new cigarette brands at low prices to exploit lower excise tax tiers poses a challenge to the intended objective of cigarette taxation, which is to reduce consumption for public health protection. This study aims to investigate the impact of a specific multi-tiered excise tax system on the creation of new brands. This study utilizes CK-1 data (application for ordering excise tape) from the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Ministry of Finance (DJBC), as the authority overseeing cigarette excise taxes in Indonesia. The data consists of nine years of research observations, from 2012 to 2020, totaling 20,379 observations. The period used corresponds to the implementation of the multi-tiered specific cigarette excise tax system. Employing empirical analysis with Poisson regression, the study examines the count data of new brands. Dummy variables for cigarette production types and other relevant factors explaining the simplification policy of cigarette excise tax are included. The empirical analysis reveals a positive association between the implementation of a specific multi-tiered excise tax system and the creation of new cigarette brands. As the number of tiers in the excise tax system increases, so does the incentive for companies to introduce new brands. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that these new brands are typically priced lower, indicating a potential limitation of the specific multi-tiered excise tax system in reducing cigarette consumption. The findings suggest the consideration of a simpler and uniform cigarette excise tax system to address the challenges posed by the proliferation of low-priced new cigarette brands. Policy adjustments are crucial to ensure that excise taxes effectively align with public health objectives while maintaining government revenue. This study underscores the importance of refining taxation policies to mitigate negative health impacts on the public caused by increased cigarette consumption.
Steviana Pasca Sarjana, Vid Adrison
Adrison V., Dauchy E. (2023). The impact of tax and price reforms on companies’ prices in a complex cigarette tax system. Applied Economics. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368 46.2023.2289905
Anderson S.P., de Palma A., Kreider B. (2001). Tax incidence in differentiated product oligopoly. Journal of Public Economics. 81(2):173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047- 2727(00)00079- 7
Bansal R., John S., Ling P.M. (2005). Cigarette advertising in Mumbai, India: targeting different socioeconomic groups, women, and youth: Table 1. Tobacco Control. 14(3):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.010173
Barad Ž.A., Burnad P., Rogošid A., Šodan S., Vuko T. (2021). Cigarette price elasticity in Croatia – analysis of household budget surveys. Journal of Applied Economics. 24(1):318–328. https:// doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2021.1928421
Barber S., Ahsan A. (2009). The tobacco excise system in Indonesia: Hindering effective tobacco control for health. Journal of Public Health Policy. 30(2):208–225. https://doi. org/10.1057/jphp.2009.12