INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (IJABM)
Financial Accountability Mechanisms in Local Governments in Uganda: A Case of Kabale District Local Government
E-ISSN: 4556-2236
P-ISSN: 5433-437X
DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/1651
The purpose of the study is to present financial accountability mechanisms in local governments, with reference to Kabale district local government. A cross-sectional research design, which used both quantitative and qualitative approaches to collect and analyze data, was adopted. Both simple random and purposive sampling techniques were used to select 117 respondents from 174 subjects. Questionnaires and personal interviews were used to collect data from respondents. Frequencies and percentages were used to analyze quantitative data, while direct quotes from interviews conducted among key informants formed the basis for qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis was aided by software for document analysis (SPSS V 20.0). The study found out that service delivery was the most commonly used financial accountability mechanism, followed by financial reporting, expenditure control and budget. The paper therefore, concluded that service delivery is the most used mechanism of financial accountability, though the district’s local budget seemed unclear on reflecting the priorities of the local people. This paper suggests that the local government should ensure that the district’s budget demonstrates community preference; salaries and wages should be paid in accordance with the district’s approved budget; expenditures on development should always be as per the approved budget, and the mode of financial reporting, particularly on liabilities should be standardized.
Perpetua Arinaitwe, Marus Eton, Moses Agaba, Abanis Turyehebwa, Bernard Patrick Ogwel & Fabian Mwosi
Auditor General (2017). Annual report of the Auditor General on the results of audit for the year 2017. Kampala, Uganda.
Bajo A, Primorac M, Runtic D (2017). Public Financial Management, Accountability, and Citizens’ Trust. Hrvatska Komparativna Javna Uprava: Casopis Teoriju Praksu Javne Uprave 17(3):389- 405.
Berner M, Smith S (2004). The state of the states: A review of state requirements for citizen participation in the local government budget process. State and Local Government Review 36(2):140-150.
Beyer A, Guttman I (2012). Voluntary Disclosure, Manipulation and Real Effects. Journal of Accounting Research 50(5):1141-1177.
Birskyte L (2013). Involving citizens in public decision making in Lithuania. Financial Theory and Practice 37(4):383-402.
Cabannes Y (2005). Participatory budgeting: Conceptual framework and analysis of its contribution to urban governance nad millenium deveopment goals. Quito, Equador: Urban management programme. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10660/
Doussy F, Doussy E (2014). Financial statements and the discharging of financial accountability of ordinary public schools in South Africa. Journal of Governance and Regulation 3(4):27-35.
Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Basto WS, Tinkler J (2006). New Public Management Is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(3):468-494.
Edeme KR, Nkalu NC (2017). Budget for Development: Lessons from 2013 budget implemntation in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and International Finance 9(4):30-35.
Elliot B, Elliot J (2012). Financial accounting and reporting. 15th Edition. Pearson education Limited.
Eton M, Murezi C, Mwosi F, Ogwel BP (2018). Internal control systems and financial accountability in Uganda: A case of selected districts in western Uganda. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research 4(4):106-111.
Gailmardy S (2012). Accountability and Principal-Agent Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
