E-ISSN: 9552-2692
P-ISSN: 2395-6590
DOI: https://iigdpublishers.com/article/434
Psychology has adopted a positivist framework established by Auguste Comte in which positive was identified with the scientific, and scientific with the discovery of natural laws. That humans are the creators of higher psychological functions and that the development of human beings is dialectic and therefore cannot be simulated by simple cause– effect understanding, should be underlined in an alternative epistemology for human beings. The approach taken in this article is that the elementary, ‘natural’ mechanisms would impede the development of psychological features because natural mechanisms are antithetical to cultural-psychological mechanisms and features. The only way that biological processes can participate with cultural processes is for them to bequeath their determining properties over behavior to culture, and for biological processes to recede into the background as a general potentiating substratum of human psychology, consciousness and behavior.
Ayai Kolstad
Michell J (2003). The Quantitative imperative: positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology 13(1):5-31.
Porter T (1995). Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Comte A (1853/2009). The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte; 2 volumes; Chapman, 1853 (reissued by Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Jovanovic G (2010). Historizing epistemology in psychology. Integr Psych Behav. 44:310-328.
Zhou H, Cacioppo J (2010). Culture and the brain: Opportunities and obstacles. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2):59-71.